Feasibility and Acceptability of a Lifestyle Intervention For Individuals With Bipolar Disorder.

Individuals with bipolar disorder are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease and are less likely to adhere to lifestyle interventions than the general population. To decrease cardiovascular risk and improve adherence to lifestyle interventions, we developed the Nutrition Exercise and Wellness Treatment (NEW Tx). NEW Tx is an 18-session, 20-week cognitive behavioral therapy-based treatment comprising 3 modules: Nutrition, Exercise, and Wellness. To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention as well as predictors of treatment satisfaction and expectations, 38 adult outpatients with bipolar disorder were randomized to either NEW Tx or a waitlist control condition. There was no statistically significant difference in dropout rates between the groups (26.3% in NEW Tx, 31.6% in the control condition). In the NEW Tx condition, participants attended a mean of 66.7% of sessions and reported moderate to high satisfaction. There were no study-related adverse events. We also found that expectations, but not perceived credibility (or believability), of NEW Tx (as measured by the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire) at baseline predicted treatment satisfaction (as measured by the Care Satisfaction Questionnaire) posttreatment. Manic symptoms at baseline predicted treatment satisfaction, and marital status predicted one's expectations of lifestyle interventions. Data suggest that NEW Tx is a feasible and acceptable intervention for individuals with bipolar disorder and that further research is warranted to explore potential moderators of treatment expectations and credibility in this clinical population.

Bipolar depression and suicidal ideation: Moderators and mediators of a complex relationship.

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients with bipolar depression have suicidal ideation (SI). This study examines some factors that link bipolar depression to SI. METHODS: 482 individuals with bipolar I or II were randomized to either lithium or quetiapine plus adjunctive personalized therapy in a 24 week comparative effectiveness trial. Severity of depression and SI were assessed with the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS). We examined potential moderators (age, gender, age of illness onset, bipolar type, comorbid anxiety, substance use, past suicide attempts, childhood abuse and treatment arm) and mediators (severity of anxiety, mania, irritability, impairment in functioning (LIFE-RIFT) and satisfaction and enjoyment of life (Q-LES-Q)) of the effect of depression on SI. Statistical analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations with repeated measures. RESULTS: Bipolar type and past suicide attempts moderated the effect of depression on SI. Life satisfaction mediated the effect of depression and SI. The relationship between anxiety, depression and SI was complex due to the high level of correlation. Treatment with lithium or quetiapine did not moderate the effect of depression on SI. LIMITATIONS: Suicide assessment was only done using an item on BISS. Patient population was not specifically chosen for high suicide risk. DISCUSSION: Individuals with Bipolar II experienced more SI with lower levels of depression severity. A history of suicide predisposed patients to higher levels of SI given the same severity of depression. Reduced life satisfaction mediates the effect of depression on SI and may be a target for therapeutic interventions.

Pilot study of a lifestyle intervention for bipolar disorder: Nutrition exercise wellness treatment (NEW Tx).

BACKGROUND: Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) are more likely than the general population to develop risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease, one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in this clinical population. To address this disproportionate medical burden, we developed Nutrition Exercise and Wellness Treatment (NEW Tx), a lifestyle intervention for individuals with BD. METHODS: In this study, participants were randomized to NEW Tx (n = 19) or a treatment as usual waitlist (n = 19). We examine the intervention's efficacy to improve the physical and psychological outcomes of individuals with BD. Assessors were blind to participant condition throughout study duration. RESULTS: The NEW Tx group reported increased weekly exercise duration and overall functioning, and decreased depression and illness severity over the study duration. However, only improvements in functioning were significantly greater in the NEW Tx group than in the control group. There were no group differences in weight loss or mood symptoms over the study duration. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to this study include lack of objective measurement of exercise and a small and relatively homogeneous sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a manualized lifestyle intervention for BD may not be ideal to improve lifestyle changes in this clinical population. Further research is needed to pilot personalized approaches to creating a healthy lifestyle in BD.

Sleep disturbance may impact treatment outcome in bipolar disorder: A preliminary investigation in the context of a large comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar patients experience sleep disturbances during and between mood episodes. Yet the impact of sleep on treatment with different medications has not been fully explored. The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential impact of poor sleep at baseline on outcomes in a randomized effectiveness trial of quetiapine and lithium. METHODS: The Bipolar CHOICE study was a 6-month, parallel group, multisite randomized controlled trial. Participants with bipolar disorder (N = 482; 59% female and age 18-70 years) received quetiapine or lithium. Patients were allowed to also receive adjunctive personalized treatments, which were guideline-informed, empirically-based medications added to treatment as needed. Medication changes were recorded as necessary clinical adjustments (NCA). Fisher's exact tests, mixed-regression models, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess demographic and clinical characteristics as well as whether sleep disturbance would predict outcomes. RESULTS: 63% of patients had baseline sleep disturbance. Individuals with sleep disturbance had worse bipolar illness severity, greater severity of depression, mania, anxiety, irritability, and psychosis, were less likely to have sustained response (17% vs. 29%; adjusted RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.78, p = 0.0006) and had more NCAs (median 0.71 vs. 0.59, p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: Our findings were limited by how we defined sleep disturbance, and by how severity of sleep disturbance was assessed with one item with a non-sleep specific measure. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline sleep disturbance was associated with more severe bipolar symptoms and worse 6-month outcomes. Further research is warranted on improving sleep in bipolar disorder, especially the role of psychosocial interventions.